ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2026
Prospective study assessing the feasibility of hippocampal-sparing radiotherapy in lung cancer patients requiring cranial irradiation.
Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLung cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with systemic therapies often limited by poor intracranial penetration, resulting in frequent brain relapses. Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) plays a central role in managing brain metastases and in prophylaxis, although it is frequently associated with significant neurocognitive decline. Hippocampal-sparing WBRT (HSWBRT) represents a strategy to preserve neurocognition and quality of life (QoL) while maintaining disease control. This study evaluated the feasibility and outcomes of HSWBRT in lung cancer patients requiring prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) or WBRT.
methodsIn this prospective study (2021-2023), 15 patients with histologically confirmed lung cancer with an indication for PCI or WBRT (lesions > 5 mm from hippocampus) were treated with HSWBRT. Target delineation followed Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) guidelines, incorporating a 5-mm isotropic margin for hippocampal avoidance. Prescribed doses were 25 Gy in 10 fractions for PCI and 30 Gy in 10 fractions for brain metastases. Neurocognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA), Trail Making Test parts A and B (Trail A/B), and the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT). Quality of life was evaluated with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EORTC Brain Cancer Module (BN20) at baseline and at 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12 months. Outcomes were compared with a retrospective cohort of 15 patients treated with conventional WBRT. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis; comparisons employed log-rank and repeated measures analysis of variance tests.
resultsMedian follow-up was 20 months. Intracranial relapse and overall survival rates did not differ significantly between the HSWBRT and WBRT arms. However, self-reported cognitive decline and QoL deterioration were lower in the HSWBRT arm at 12 months (QoL: 83.33 vs. 66.67, p = 0.07). The MOCA scores remained stable, and Trail A/B performance improved post-treatment in the HSWBRT cohort.
conclusionOur findings show that HSWBRT appears feasible and effective in preserving neurocognitive function and QoL in lung cancer patients, without compromising intracranial control. Larger randomized studies are needed to validate its role in routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42098481What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.