SynthesisActa neurochirurgica2026
Machine learning-based prediction of proximal junctional pathology after adult spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Acta neurochirurgica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and failure (PJF) remain challenging and incompletely predictable adverse event following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Machine learning (ML) models have been proposed to improve risk stratification, but performance varies and clinical applicability remains uncertain. A systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis was performed to synthesize the predictive performance of ML-based models for proximal junctional pathology after ASD surgery.
methodsPubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to February 2026. Studies developing or validating ML models predicting PJK or PJF following ASD surgery were included. Diagnostic performance was synthesized using random-effects models, pooling sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (dOR), and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves. A prespecified secondary analysis pooled one highest-performing model per study to reduce within-study dependence. Risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST and certainty of evidence using GRADE.
resultsSixteen studies comprising 3625 patients and 30 ML models met inclusion criteria. Twenty-two models provided extractable test-set data for diagnostic synthesis. Pooled sensitivity was 0.51 (95% CI: 0.41-0.61) and specificity 0.84 (95% CI: 0.78-0.89), with a pooled AUC of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.62-0.72). In the highest-performing model analysis, pooled sensitivity improved to 0.63 (95% CI: 0.55-0.71) and AUC to 0.77 95% CI: 0.71- 0.83). Specificity remained high (0.86). External validation was rare, and calibration was inconsistently reported. Frequently prioritized predictors included sagittal alignment parameters, construct characteristics, bone quality metrics, and age.
conclusionsML-based models demonstrate biologically coherent but clinically moderate discrimination for predicting proximal junctional pathology following ASD surgery. Current performance supports risk stratification rather than categorical decision-making. Progress toward clinically actionable prediction will require standardized endpoint definitions, robust external validation, and calibration-centered reporting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.