ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2026
Temporal shifts in area-level access to cycling infrastructure for equity-deserving groups in three Canadian cities: A descriptive epidemiologic study.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multi-city investigations of how access to cycling infrastructure changes over time for equity-deserving communities have been absent in Canada and are scarce internationally. In this descriptive epidemiological study, we evaluated how area-level (ecological) access to cycling infrastructure varied by neighbourhood socio-demographic profiles in three Canadian cities (Montréal, Vancouver, and Victoria) across the 2011, 2016, and 2021 census years. For each city and year, we calculated the road network distance to the nearest cycling infrastructure from the population-representative centroids of the census dissemination area as the outcome. The independent variables were the area-level proportions of equity-deserving groups. These were Indigenous people, racialized people, recent immigrants, people in low-income households, tenants, individuals with lower educational attainment, children, and older adults. We employed linear and Bayesian spatial regression methods to examine the relationship between the tertile proportions of each population group and the outcome for each city and census year. Areas with a higher proportion of children had lower proximity to cycling infrastructure, regardless of city or census year. Similar patterns were observed for areas with a higher proportion of older adults, although to a lesser extent. The inequity across the proportion of children narrowed over time in Montréal, but not in Vancouver or Victoria. In contrast, areas with a greater proportion of low-income populations had equal or better access to cycling infrastructure across all cities and time periods. These findings on access to cycling infrastructure are concerning due to the lack of age-friendliness in the implementation of infrastructure in these cities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42098458What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.