ArticleScientific reports2026
Fuzzy adaptive human memory optimization based optimal task scheduling in cloud computing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Task scheduling has become a significant research focus in cloud computing because of the growing need for efficient resource utilization. This paper explores an innovative scheduling approach harnessing Human Memory Optimization (HMO) and Fuzzy Adaptive Human Memory Optimization (FAHMO). Such techniques are inspired by human cognitive principles and employ an adaptive search strategy that maintains an effective trade-off between exploration and exploitation. By maintaining a history of successful and unsuccessful scheduling decisions, HMO enables continuous enhancement of scheduling efficiency. Integrating fuzzy logic into FAHMO improves the decision-making process by effectively managing uncertainty and ambiguity in task scheduling, thereby producing more flexible and efficient solutions. Comparative analysis demonstrates that HMO and FAHMO outperform conventional metaheuristic algorithms, including PSO-PGA, in terms of convergence speed and task completion time. The results confirm that the proposed approach significantly reduces makespan and enhances overall cloud task scheduling performance. Specifically, FAHMO achieved up to 67.46% improvement in makespan and 63.18% in convergence accuracy compared to PSO-PGA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.