ArticleCarbon balance and management2026
The impact of carbon emission trading pilot policy on China's energy eco-efficiency.
Article in Carbon balance and management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- China's carbon emission trading and income inequality: evidence from factor substitution.Carbon balance and management · 2026Article
- Can better institutions drive cleaner energy in the United States? insights from wavelet quantile regression.Carbon balance and management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Under the "Dual Carbon" goals (carbon peaking and carbon neutrality), China's Carbon Emissions Trading System (CETS) represents a key policy tool in addressing climate change, significantly contributing to carbon reduction and the enhancement of Energy Eco-Efficiency (EEE). As a comprehensive measure of coordination within the "energy-economy-environment" system, EEE effectively captures a country's or region's ability to harmonize energy consumption, green and sustainable development, and environmental protection. This study computes the EEE index using the SBM model and examines how a carbon emission trading pilot policy (CETPP) affects EEE in China and its spatial spillover by employing a difference-in-differences (DID) model and spatial econometric model. The results indicate that CETPP implementation significantly enhances regional EEE and advances China's green and low-carbon transition process by improving the balance between economic and environmental goals, increasing employment, diversifying the energy supply, and strengthening economic resilience. Mechanistic research reveals that the CETPP promotes the improvement of EEE by reducing pollution emission intensity and that regional innovation ability can enhance the positive impact of the CETPP on regional EEE. Further analysis revealed significant endogenous spatial interactions in EEE across Chinese regions. However, EEE in the eastern and western regions can create a "siphon" effect on production factors that hinders development in neighbouring areas. Implementing a CETPP in a region not only advances local EEE but also stimulates EEE improvements in adjacent areas, with the strongest spillover effect observed in eastern China. To this end, it is essential to enhance the management of carbon dioxide emissions, actively advance the establishment of carbon trading markets. Moreover, region-specific measures should be implemented to promote the coordinated improvement of regional EEE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.