Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42098370›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2026

Commercial AI for CT lung cancer screening: product capabilities, coverage of nodule management tasks and supporting evidence.

Noa Antonissen, Steven Schalekamp, Horst K Hahn, Kicky G van Leeuwen, Colin Jacobs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Noa AntonissenDiagnostic Image Analysis Group, Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboudumc, The Netherlands. noa.antonissen@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8702-3640
Steven SchalekampDiagnostic Image Analysis Group, Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboudumc, The Netherlands.
Horst K HahnUniversity of Bremen and Fraunhofer MEVIS, Bremen, Germany.
Kicky G van LeeuwenRomion Health, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Colin JacobsDiagnostic Image Analysis Group, Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboudumc, The Netherlands.

Funding

SOLACE project, a project funded under the EU4Health Programme 2021-2027 101101187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo characterize the capabilities of CE-marked AI products for lung nodule analysis in lung cancer screening (LCS), quantify their coverage of tasks defined in nodule management recommendations, and assess their peer-reviewed evidence. MATERIALS AND

methodsSix core tasks in LCS (nodule detection, classification, measurement, growth assessment, malignancy risk estimation, and structured management) were derived from 4 nodule management recommendations: Lung-RADS 2022, British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines, European Union Position Statement (EUPS), and European Society of Thoracic Imaging (ESTI). Products were identified through www.healthairegister.com . Vendors confirmed capabilities using a standardized questionnaire; public documentation supplemented non-responders. Task coverage was calculated as the percentage of functional overlap (0-100%) per recommendation. Peer-reviewed evidence was evaluated using a six-level efficacy framework and assessed for study characteristics.

resultsIn total, 16 products from 16 vendors were included; 10 vendors completed questionnaires. Analysis showed that 14 products detect and measure solid and subsolid nodules, 12 support growth assessment, and 9 provide malignancy risk estimation (PanCan in 5, AI-based scores in 4). No product provides support for endobronchial or cystic lesions. High task coverage (> 75%) was observed in 10 products for EUPS and 4 for BTS, whereas no product achieved high coverage for Lung-RADS or ESTI. Overall, 60 peer-reviewed studies were identified; 7% were prospective and evidence clustered at lower efficacy levels: 70% assessed diagnostic accuracy, while none reported patient outcomes or societal impact.

conclusionNumerous CE-certified AI products could support CT-based lung cancer screening, but gaps in task coverage and predominantly lower-level evidence necessitate cautious, monitored implementation. KEY POINTS: Question Do commercially available AI products for lung nodule analysis functionally cover international nodule management recommendation-defined tasks, and what peer-reviewed clinical evidence supports them? Findings AI products support standard nodule detection and measurement in line with management recommendations but lack support for endobronchial or cystic lesions and high-level clinical evidence. Clinical relevance CE-marked AI products can assist radiologists with core lung cancer screening tasks, but capability gaps exist. Limited high-level clinical evidence complicates integrating AI into guidelines, securing reimbursement, and formulating recommendations for its use in lung cancer screening programs.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEarly Detection of CancerLung NeoplasmsSolitary Pulmonary NoduleTomography, X-Ray ComputedEvidence-Based MedicineHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesArtificial intelligenceDevice approvalEvidence-based practiceLung neoplasmsRadiology

Identifiers

PMID42098370
PMCPMC13451236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.