Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42098343›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026

The influence of active suppression on stimulus-response binding and retrieval.

Ruyi Qiu, Yanzhi Mo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ruyi QiuDepartment of Psychology, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, 410208, China. ruyiqiu@hnucm.edu.cn.
Yanzhi MoDepartment of Psychology, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, 410208, China.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province 2025JJ60209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feature integration across perception and action is a crucial aspect of cognitive processing, creating retrievable episodic representations known as stimulus-response episodes or event files. While some studies suggest that attention is unnecessary for stimulus-response binding and retrieval, others argue its importance in these processes. To reconcile this contradiction, the current study proposed an attentional threshold for feature integration in event files and tentatively tested this assumption. Since active suppression has been documented to down-regulate attention allocation toward certain stimuli, the current study set out to test the influence of active suppression on stimulus-response binding and retrieval. More specifically, we employed a modified distractor-response binding (DRB) paradigm with a search-and-identification task. Participants searched for targets defined by either a positive feature (Experiment 1, e.g., red when the target is a red letter) or a negative feature (Experiment 2, e.g., blue when the target is a non-blue letter). Distractors were unattended in Experiment 1 but were actively suppressed in Experiment 2, when they carried negative features. Significant DRB effects were observed in Experiment 1 but not in Experiment 2, suggesting that active suppression may reduce attention allocation toward distractors below a critical threshold for feature integration in event files. The current findings support the notion of an attentional threshold which determines what can be involved in the stimulus-response binding and retrieval processes.

Indexed as

AttentionColor PerceptionInhibition, PsychologicalMental RecallPattern Recognition, VisualAdultFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung AdultActive suppressionAttentionDistractorNegative featureStimulus-response binding and retrieval

Identifiers

PMID42098343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.