ArticleScientific reports2026
Robust Kalman filter for heavy-tailed process and measurement noises.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Measurements and dynamic process models are often contaminated by errors or noises. In many real applications, for simplicity of computations, it is assumed such errors are random and follow a normal distribution. However, the normal-distribution assumption can only be an approximation; and the true distribution can be a heavier tailed one rather than the assumed normal one. Some optimal estimators, including Kalman filters, can face serious performance degradation in the presence of heavy-tailed distributions. Previous robust Kalman filtering schemes are not directly targeted on these two types of noises, especially the process noise; instead, the predicted state estimation error is considered together with the measurement noise. The topic of the current study is the robust modification of the Kalman filtering against heavy-tailed distributions of both the process and measurement noises. A new robust Kalman filter is proposed. The new filter is simple, in the sense that it has the same structure of a standard Kalman filter. It is highly automated, in the sense that it can be initialized by the standard Kalman filtering. It is effective as it is insensitive to heavy-tailed distributions of both the process and measurement noises. The proposed method is general and flexible, in the sense that it can be readily modified to consider reliable prior distributional information. Simulation of a tracking application and real data analysis of an integrated GNSS and INS application demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The tracking simulation shows the proposed method reduces the positioning Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) by 11.1% compared with the standard Kalman filter, and the reduction can reach 20.0% with five iterations. The real GNSS/INS navigation experiment achieves up to 22% reduction in positioning RMSE and obvious improvements in velocimetry performance relative to the standard Kalman filter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.