Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42098315›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Comparative evaluation of machine learning and deep learning approaches for compressive strength prediction of geopolymer concrete.

H Ezz, S M Bakr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

H EzzCivil Engineering Department, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt. hy.ezz@nrc.sci.eg.
S M BakrAl Madinah High Institute for Engineering and Technology, Giza, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geopolymer concrete has emerged as a promising sustainable alternative to ordinary Portland cement concrete due to its lower environmental impact and favorable engineering performance. However, accurately predicting its compressive strength remains challenging because it is governed by complex interactions among binder composition, activator characteristics, curing conditions, and other mixture parameters. Therefore, reliable data-driven predictive models are needed to support efficient design and performance estimation. For this the study develops a data-driven framework for predicting the compressive strength of geopolymer concrete using both machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL). A unified database of 594 geopolymer mix designs was compiled from published literature, covering key mix parameters (binder constituents, activator contents, aggregates, water/superplasticizer, fiber contents, and curing age). The dataset was cleaned and divided into 80% training and 20% testing for unbiased evaluation. Multiple supervised ML models (SVM, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost) were trained and assessed using MAE, MSE, R

Indexed as

Artificial neural networkCompressive strengthDeep learningGeopolymer concreteMachine learningPredictionSHAP

Identifiers

PMID42098315
PMCPMC13153404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.