ArticleScientific reports2026
A natural coastal blowhole as a novel wave energy extraction mechanism; experimental, cfd, and probabilistic evaluation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natural coastal blowholes are rare geomorphological features in which incident waves induce oscillatory motion within coastal cavities, compressing and venting air through a surface outlet and forming a naturally integrated analogue of an oscillating water column. This study evaluates natural blowholes as a nature-based solution for low-impact wave-energy extraction using a combined experimental-numerical-probabilistic framework, with Chabahar Bay in the Oman Sea as a case study. A laboratory flume model was constructed to reproduce blowhole airflow dynamics, and outlet air velocity measurements were used to compute mass flow rate and validate a CFD model under consistent boundary conditions. The validated CFD framework was then extended to the field geometry to estimate pneumatic kinetic power, yielding a peak outlet velocity of approximately 21.6 m s⁻¹, a mass flow rate of approximately 13.0 kg s⁻¹, and an associated kinetic power of about 3 kW per vent. To represent variability in ocean forcing, a Monte Carlo framework comprising 5,000 realizations was parameterized using regional wave-climate statistics and propagated through the deep-water wave-power formulation to quantify uncertainty in wave-power flux. The mean wave-power flux is 8.7 kW m⁻¹ with a 95% confidence interval of 1.6-22.5 kW m⁻¹, and pronounced seasonal variability is observed, with mean flux ranging from approximately 4.5 kW m⁻¹ in winter to 13.2 kW m⁻¹ in summer. These results demonstrate that natural blowholes can provide measurable, site-specific energy yield while minimizing additional coastal infrastructure, and that probabilistic assessment is essential for quantifying uncertainty and seasonality governing long-term reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.