ArticleScientific reports2026
A vision-based multi-camera fusion and CAD projection framework for risk-point identification in metro stations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metro systems face challenges in managing localized congestion and ensuring passenger safety, particularly under high-density passenger flows and unexpected disruption scenarios. Conventional crowd detection methods often fail due to severe occlusion, insufficient coverage, and excessive latency, making them unreliable for providing operators with accurate risk identification and control support. To address this fundamental problem, this paper proposes a vision-driven framework for risk-point identification tailored to the complex spatial structure of metro stations. The framework adopts a world-coordinate-first multi-camera fusion strategy combined with CAD (Computer-Aided Design) floor-plan projection to achieve station-wide coverage and spatial interpretability; it introduces a density-speed dual-factor risk index to overcome the limitations of single-density indicators in capturing dynamic anomalies; and it incorporates a baseline-increment mechanism to effectively distinguish recurrent congestion from emerging anomalies, supporting fine-grained risk management. Empirical studies at two representative transfer hubs in Shanghai-Station A and Station B-demonstrate that the framework consistently achieves recall rates above 0.9 and 100% coverage of risk points in both routine and disruption scenarios, while sustaining real-time performance at 28 FPS. These results confirm that the proposed framework effectively bridges the gap between macroscopic passenger flow forecasting and microscopic risk sensing, offering a promising technical foundation for pilot-stage operational safety management and fine-grained risk sensing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.