ArticleCommunications medicine2026
Sequential versus upfront oxaliplatin-based therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: long-term outcomes of a randomized phase 3 trial.
Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhether oxaliplatin should be given sequentially or upfront in metastatic colorectal cancer remains clinically relevant, especially for older patients often underrepresented in trials.
methodsWe report updated overall survival and prespecified quality-of-life outcomes from the open-label, randomized, multicenter phase 3 C-cubed trial in Japan. This trial was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000015405 (October 14, 2014) and UMIN000036690 (May 10, 2019). The primary endpoint was reported previously. Of 311 randomized patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer, 300 were included in the full analysis set. Patients received fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab, with oxaliplatin added at progression, or received fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab from the start. Overall survival was analyzed using Cox regression and time-restricted survival methods. Quality of life was assessed prospectively using patient-reported questionnaires.
resultsHere we show that overall survival is similar between strategies. Median overall survival is 27.2 months with sequential treatment and 27.4 months with upfront treatment (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.33; p = 0.98). Additional time-restricted and milestone analyses show no between-group differences. There is no evidence that age modifies the relative treatment effect. Patient-reported outcomes indicate a lower early treatment burden with sequential treatment, including smaller early declines in physical functioning and less sensory neuropathy.
conclusionsUpdated overall survival is comparable between sequential and upfront oxaliplatin-based strategies, while sequential treatment is associated with lower early treatment burden. These findings support individualized selection of first-line treatment based on age, vulnerability, and treatment goals.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.