ArticleCommunications medicine2026
Temporal trends in pregnancy outcomes during a health system shock.
Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo better understand reported COVID-19 pandemic effects on pregnancy, we examined temporal trends in pregnancy outcomes in a diverse population from South London, United Kingdom.
methodsWe included 31,411 singleton pregnancies with complete registration and birth outcomes across pre-pandemic (May 1, 2019-March 22, 2020, 24.5%), pandemic lockdowns (March 23, 2020-July 17, 2021, 32.3%), and pandemic without lockdown epochs (July 18, 2021-April 22, 2023, 43.2%). Multivariable regression was employed to evaluate outcomes by study epoch, adjusting for potential confounders (e.g., ethnicity, deprivation, site), followed by generalized additive modelling to visualise monthly trends.
resultsHere we show that of 17 outcomes: six have stable trends (e.g., preterm birth, stillbirth); eight show linear trends, either decreasing (e.g., gestational age at birth, vaginal tears) or increasing (e.g., Caesareans, postpartum haemorrhage); and three show quadratic (complex) trends (e.g., secondary mental health services, labour induction).
conclusionsOverall, most outcomes during the pandemic mirror pre-pandemic trends, with fluctuations observed likely due to site-specific responses. Our findings highlight the need for temporal analysis of pregnancy outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.