ArticleScientific data2026
SangsterLogP - the largest publicly available dataset of logP values.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- LogPpred: An AI-Based Predictive Model for Accurate Estimation of Molecular LogP.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present SangsterLogP, the largest publicly available curated dataset of experimental logP values, comprising more than 23k unique molecules, with experimental logP values ranging from -3.8 to 11.7 (about 15.9 log units). The dataset originated from Dr. James Sangster's comprehensive literature review of over 3k sources. We implemented a systematic curation workflow including a) logD-to-logP adjustment for ionised compounds and b) consensus-based residual analysis for outliers and duplicates removal. External validation using retrospective and prospective test sets demonstrated robust predictive performance (RMSE of 0.34 and 0.47 log units, respectively). SangsterLogP also substantially expands coverage of chemical space compared to the widely used legacy PHYSPROP database, including compounds in the beyond-Rule-of-5 domain. The fully annotated dataset, including experimental conditions and sources, is freely accessible via the Zenodo repository and on the Online Chemical database and Modelling Environment website.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.