ArticleNPJ vaccines2026
Maturation-deficient chikungunya virus elicits protective immune responses in a murine challenge model.
Article in NPJ vaccines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Maturation of chikungunya virus (CHIKV) particles is dependent on cleavage of the precursor glycoprotein p62 into the proteins E3 and E2 by the cellular protease furin. Here, we produced immature CHIKV particles by infecting furin-deficient cells and characterized them in comparison to mature particles by electron microscopy. Ectopic expression of furin in the furin-deficient cells restored the production of infectious particles, underpinning the importance of this enzyme in particle maturation. To prevent furin‑mediated maturation in mammalian cells, we engineered a recombinant CHIKV in which the furin cleavage site was replaced by a Tobacco Etch virus (TEV) protease site, rendering the virus non‑infectious unless treated in vitro with TEV protease. TEV‑matured particles became infectious and, when used for immunization, induced a stronger immune response than their untreated counterparts, as evidenced by higher neutralizing antibody titers. In vivo, a single immunization with TEV‑treated particles protected IFNAR‑/‑ mice against a lethal CHIKV challenge. In immunocompetent mice, vaccination also reduced viremia and CHIKV‑induced footpad swelling. Together, these findings demonstrate that in vitro maturation of CHIKV modified with a TEV cleavage site promotes a safe, replication limited immunogenic particle, establishing a promising platform for developing vaccines against viruses that require furin protease maturation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.