Trial reportNature communications2026
Nivolumab plus ipilimumab for chemotherapy-refractory metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: results from the randomized portion of the phase 2 CheckMate 650 trial.
Trial report in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02985957 (A Phase 2 Trial of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab, Ipilimumab Alone, or Cabazitaxel in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2 Trial of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab, Ipilimumab Alone, or Cabazitaxel in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, and Beyond.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We report on the randomized portion of the phase 2, open-label CheckMate 650 trial (NCT02985957), in which docetaxel-experienced, biologically male patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer were randomized 2:2:1:2 to nivolumab 3 mg /kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg /kg (n = 73), nivolumab 1 mg /kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg /kg (n = 74), ipilimumab 3 mg /kg (n = 38), or cabazitaxel (n = 74). Primary endpoints were objective response rate and radiographic progression-free survival; key secondary endpoints included overall survival, prostate-specific antigen response rate, and safety. This portion of CheckMate 650 was not designed to statistically compare between cohorts. Respectively, objective response rates (95% CI) were 9.3% (2.6-22.1), 19.5% (8.8-34.9), 4.5% (0.1-22.8), and 12.2% (4.1-26.2), and median radiographic progression-free survival (95% CI) was 3.9 (2.2-7.6), 4.2 (3.3-5.6), 3.5 (2.1-5.8), and 7.9 (5.6-9.3) months. Respective incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events was 28.8%, 30.1%, 18.4%, and 34.7%. Preliminary post hoc biomarker analyses in patients who received treatment with any immunotherapy regimen (i.e., treated with either of the nivolumab plus ipilimumab regimens or with ipilimumab alone, n = 12) identified a transcriptional signature, derived from the most highly expressed genes across cell types within select perivascular immune niches (comprising CD31
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.