Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42098095›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

The entorhinal spatial map integrates visual identity information of landmarks.

Garret Wang, Farid Shahid, Taylor J Malone, Jean Tyan, Kyle Cekada, Lujia Chen, Yi Gu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Distinct brain regions map olfactory and visual spaces.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Garret Wang *Spatial Navigation and Memory Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Farid Shahid *Spatial Navigation and Memory Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Taylor J MaloneSpatial Navigation and Memory Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2358-4665
Jean TyanSpatial Navigation and Memory Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2476-369X
Kyle CekadaSpatial Navigation and Memory Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Lujia ChenSpatial Navigation and Memory Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Yi GuSpatial Navigation and Memory Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. yi.gu@nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4005-1622

Funding

Neural mechanism of spatial navigation and memoryZIANS009415 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI GU, YI · 2020 to 2025
$13.4M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA NS009415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Landmarks guide navigation by providing information through their location and identity. The medial entorhinal cortex (MEC) is well known for representing landmark location, but whether it also encodes landmark identity remains unclear. Here we show, using two-photon calcium imaging of MEC neurons in mice navigating multiple virtual environments, that a population of neurons known as cue cells encodes landmark identity. Cue cells respond selectively to individual landmarks and produce more distinct activity patterns for visually disparate landmarks than for identical ones. Identity encoding is modulated by the spatial shift of cue cell activity relative to landmark location and is context dependent, changing across environments, but remaining stable within the same environment despite repeated experience. In contrast, cue cells' representation of landmark location changes with experience. Grid cells, another major MEC cell type, more strongly represent landmark location, but only weakly encode identity. These findings suggest that the MEC integrates both the location and identity of landmarks to support navigation.

Indexed as

Entorhinal CortexSpace PerceptionAnimalsCuesGrid CellsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeurons

Identifiers

PMID42098095
PMCPMC13365227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.