Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42097810›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in developmental biology2026

Stem cell competition.

Erika A Bach

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Erika A BachDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States. Electronic address: erika.bach@nyu.edu.

Funding

Elucidating mechanisms of spermatogonial stem cell competitionR35GM156624 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Erika A Bach · 2025 to 2026
$909k
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM156624
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell competition is a conserved, fitness-based process in which "winner" cells eliminate or displace less-fit "loser" neighbors, thereby shaping development, tissue homeostasis, and disease. This review synthesizes how principles of competition operate in stem cell compartments, focusing on the adult Drosophila testis as a genetically tractable model where neutral competition provides a baseline for stem cell turnover, and defined genetic perturbations bias competition to favor specific clones. I compare intra- and inter-lineage competition among somatic cyst stem cells, germline stem cells, and dedifferentiating germ cells, highlighting mechanisms that link signaling, proliferation, adhesion, and niche remodeling to competitive fitness. I then discuss mammalian paradigms such as clonal hematopoiesis, intestinal "supercompetitors," and spermatogonial stem cell dynamics in open niches, framing stem cell competition as a driver of aging, clonal evolution, and cancer risk.

Indexed as

Cell CompetitionStem CellsAnimalsDrosophilaHumansMaleSignal TransductionStem Cell NicheTestisBiased competitionBone morphogenetic proteinChinmoDrosophilaEgfrGermline stem cellHedgehogHippoJAK-STATMAPKNeutral competitionNicheRasSocs36ESomatic stem cellStem cell competitionSupercompetitorTestisZfh1

Identifiers

PMID42097810
PMCPMC13638216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.