ArticleNeurospine2026
Sagittal Imbalance Deterioration After S2-Alar-Iliac Fixation in Adult Spinal Deformity: What Role Does Dynamic Hip Joint Coverage Play?
Article in Neurospine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To determine the role of dynamic hip joint coverage in maintaining postoperative sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients following S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) fixation. Methods: A total of 224 ASD patients who underwent S2AI fixation were enrolled. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on pre-to-post (from preoperative to postoperative) changes in femoral head coverage (ΔFHC): change group (group C) and noncoverage change group (group NC). Group C was further subdivided according to FHC recovery during follow-up into rebound (group C-R) and nonrebound (group C-NR) groups. Clinical outcomes and radiographic parameters of hip and spinopelvic alignment were assessed preoperatively, at the initial postoperative standing, and at the 2-year follow-up. Results: Compared to group C, patients in group NC demonstrated a higher incidence of sagittal imbalance-related mechanical complications at 2-year follow-up, with a greater tendency for sagittal imbalance progression (p=0.013), a larger post-to-follow-up change in sagittal vertical axis (ΔSVA) (p=0.029), and a higher incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) (p=0.031). Although there was no significant difference in PJK incidence between group C-NR and group C-R (p=0.845), group C-NR showed a greater tendency for postoperative sagittal imbalance aggravation (p=0.025), with a significantly larger ΔSVA during follow-up (p=0.002). The optimal cutoff values for predicting postoperative sagittal imbalance aggravation were 3.5% for pre-to-post ΔFHC (area under the curve [AUC]=0.694) and 1.8% for post-to-follow-up ΔFHC (AUC=0.713). Conclusion: Dynamic postoperative changes in hip joint coverage, characterized by the FHC, are associated with postoperative sagittal balance maintenance. Patients with limited pre-to-post and post-to-follow-up changes in the FHC demonstrate compromised hip joint compensatory capacity, thereby increasing the risk of postoperative sagittal imbalance-related mechanical complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.