ArticleNeurospine2026
Reducibility-Based Posterior Reduction and Fusion Strategies for Atlantoaxial Dislocation: A Clinical and Radiological Study.
Article in Neurospine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of posterior reduction and fusion strategies, with or without interfacet joints distraction and cage implantation, based on reducibility, in the surgical management of atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD). Methods: Patients who underwent posterior reduction and fusion surgery for AAD in our institution were included. They were categorized into 2 groups based on reducibility. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), visual analogue scale (VAS), and patient-reported satisfaction scores were collected. The atlantodental interval, distance of the tip of the odontoid to Chamberlain's line (DOCL), clivus-axial angle (CXA) and mean obliquity of the atlantoaxial articular facet (OAAF) were measured on computed tomography (CT) images. Fusion was evaluated using CT and dynamic x-rays. Results: A total of 90 patients (45 males and 45 females) were included. Among them, 54 patients in the reducible group underwent direct posterior reduction and fusion, and 36 patients in the irreducible group were treated with additional interfacet joint distraction and cage implantation. All patients showed significant improvements in JOA and VAS scores postoperatively. In the irreducible group, the preoperative CXA was smaller, whereas the OAAF was greater. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified optimal cutoff value of OAAF in predicting reducibility was 32.4° (sensitivity: 86.1%, specificity: 81.5%). Postoperative changes in DOCL and CXA were more pronounced in irreducible group. The fusion rates were comparable in the 2 groups (92.6% vs. 94.4%, p=0.730). Conclusion: The reducibility-based posterior reduction fusion strategy achieves satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes in the surgical management of AAD. For reducible cases, direct reduction under continuous intraoperative skull traction is preferred to minimize surgical trauma. In contrast, interfacet joints distraction and cage implantation are essential for irreducible cases. Preoperative OAAF may act as a potential predictor of reducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.