ArticleNeurospine2026
Automated Measurement of Occipito-Axial Angle on Cervical Radiographs Using a Deep Learning Object Detection Model: A Proof-of-Concept Study.
Article in Neurospine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Maintaining the occipito-axial (O-C2) angle following occipitocervical fusion is crucial to prevent postoperative complications. Although automated O-C2 measurement has been reported, practical methods that provide rapid results for routine practice remain limited. This study aimed to develop a deep learning model using the YOLO (You Only Look Once) object detection algorithm to automatically identify anatomical landmarks and rapidly calculate the O-C2 angle. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using cervical spine radiographs from 2 independent facilities. The internal dataset comprised 574 lateral cervical radiographs from 271 patients for model development, while the external validation dataset included 100 radiographs from 100 patients. Model performance was evaluated against manual measurements by 3 expert raters. Results: The model demonstrated excellent detection performance, achieving perfect metrics for the hard palate (F1 score: 1.00) and high performance for the occipital bone (F1 score: 0.97), anteroinferior corner of C2 (F1 score: 0.99), and posteroinferior corner of C2 (F1 score: 0.99). For O-C2 angle estimation, the mean absolute error was 2.35° and root mean squared error was 2.98°, with an accuracy of 94.7% for determining the presence or absence of the O-C2 angle (i.e., whether all 4 anatomical landmarks were simultaneously detected). Bland-Altman analysis revealed minimal bias (0.57°; 95% confidence interval, -0.06° to 1.12°) with limits of agreement from -5.19° to 6.33°. Inference time was approximately 0.14 s per image. Conclusion: Our deep learning model enables rapid and accurate O-C2 angle measurement on lateral cervical radiographs, demonstrating performance comparable to expert raters and potential clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.