Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42097751›Full record

ArticleNeurospine2026

Automated Measurement of Occipito-Axial Angle on Cervical Radiographs Using a Deep Learning Object Detection Model: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Shun Yamamoto, Yutaro Fuse, Yoshitaka Nagashima, Kensaku Mori, Takashi Abe, Mamoru Matsuo, Tomomi Gonda, Nobuhiro Hata, Yusuke Nishimura, Ryuta Saito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurospine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shun YamamotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Yutaro FuseDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Yoshitaka NagashimaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Kensaku MoriGraduate School of Informatics, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Takashi AbeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Mamoru MatsuoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Tomomi GondaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Nobuhiro HataDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sakura General Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Yusuke NishimuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Ryuta SaitoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Funding

Aichi Health Promotion FoundationJapan Science and Technology Agency JPMJBS2422Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Maintaining the occipito-axial (O-C2) angle following occipitocervical fusion is crucial to prevent postoperative complications. Although automated O-C2 measurement has been reported, practical methods that provide rapid results for routine practice remain limited. This study aimed to develop a deep learning model using the YOLO (You Only Look Once) object detection algorithm to automatically identify anatomical landmarks and rapidly calculate the O-C2 angle. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using cervical spine radiographs from 2 independent facilities. The internal dataset comprised 574 lateral cervical radiographs from 271 patients for model development, while the external validation dataset included 100 radiographs from 100 patients. Model performance was evaluated against manual measurements by 3 expert raters. Results: The model demonstrated excellent detection performance, achieving perfect metrics for the hard palate (F1 score: 1.00) and high performance for the occipital bone (F1 score: 0.97), anteroinferior corner of C2 (F1 score: 0.99), and posteroinferior corner of C2 (F1 score: 0.99). For O-C2 angle estimation, the mean absolute error was 2.35° and root mean squared error was 2.98°, with an accuracy of 94.7% for determining the presence or absence of the O-C2 angle (i.e., whether all 4 anatomical landmarks were simultaneously detected). Bland-Altman analysis revealed minimal bias (0.57°; 95% confidence interval, -0.06° to 1.12°) with limits of agreement from -5.19° to 6.33°. Inference time was approximately 0.14 s per image. Conclusion: Our deep learning model enables rapid and accurate O-C2 angle measurement on lateral cervical radiographs, demonstrating performance comparable to expert raters and potential clinical utility.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCervical vertebraeDeep learningRadiography

Identifiers

PMID42097751
PMCPMC13152714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.