ArticleBMJ open2026
Variations in symptoms, endoscopy use and emergency diagnosis of colorectal cancer by body mass index: a retrospective cohort study using linked electronic health records in England.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesBody mass index (BMI) confers a higher risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and may influence cancer diagnostic pathways. We investigated variations in diagnostic pathways by BMI category among patients with symptomatic CRC.
designRetrospective cohort study using linked cancer registry, primary, and secondary care data.
settingEngland
participants5571 patients with symptomatic CRC diagnosed in England between 2011 and 2015. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Route to CRC diagnosis (emergency presentation and fast-track referrals among patients with new-onset red flag symptoms), presenting symptoms and pre-diagnostic endoscopy use.
resultsRed-flag symptoms (change in bowel habit, rectal bleeding) were more frequently recorded among patients with rectal cancer with obesity and overweight versus normal weight (65.2% and 65.5% vs 56.8%, respectively). Among colon cancer patients endoscopy during the year pre-diagnosis was used in a greater proportion of patients with obesity versus normal weight (72.8% vs 64.4%, p<0.001). Among patients with colon cancer with red-flag symptoms, being overweight versus normal weight was associated with higher odds of fast-track referral compared with diagnosis through other routes (OR: 1.48, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.88). Obesity was associated with lower odds of emergency presentation, compared with normal weight (colon 23.6% vs 32.1%; adjusted OR: 0.72, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.90; rectum 8.3% vs 14.8%; OR: 0.57, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.92).
conclusionsPatients with CRC with higher BMI are more likely to be referred urgently and less likely to experience emergency cancer diagnosis than normal weight patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.