Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42097646›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Navigating a vulnerable transition: a qualitative study of the role of companions and providers in pregnancy and childbirth in Burkina Faso.

Emma Wallengren, Kadija Ouedraogo, Claudia Hanson, Helle Mölsted Alvesson, Fadima Yaya Bocoum, Charles Paulin Kaboré, Alexandre Dumont, Ana Pilar Betrán, Amanda Cleeve

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emma WallengrenDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kadija OuedraogoInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Claudia HansonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8066-7873
Helle Mölsted AlvessonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Fadima Yaya BocoumInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Charles Paulin KaboréInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8992-6971
Alexandre DumontCEPED, Institute for Research on Sustainable Development, IRD-Université de Paris, ERL INSERM SAGESUD, Paris, France.
Ana Pilar BetránUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5631-5883
Amanda CleeveDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden amanda.cleeve@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8115-5503

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore women's expectations and experiences of care and support from pregnancy to childbirth in Burkina Faso, with a focus on the role and impact of companions and providers.

designAn exploratory qualitative study based on in-depth interviews with purposively sampled participants and employing reflexive thematic analysis.

settingTwo public hospitals in urban Burkina Faso having implemented the 'QUALIty DECision-making by women and providers for appropriate use of caesarean section' intervention.

participants24 purposively selected postpartum women with variation in terms of parity, mode of birth, labour companionship experiences, education level and occupation were interviewed before discharge from the hospital.

resultsThe two themes generated from the analysis elucidate how women rely on providers and companions to navigate uncertainty and vulnerability experienced during pregnancy and childbirth. Women viewed providers as essential for managing the biomedical risks of childbirth and voiced their need for care at critical moments. They expected companions to enhance the non-clinical aspects of their experiences by providing spiritual support and alleviating feelings of loneliness. However, participants also expressed ambivalence about companions witnessing intimate aspects of their birth experience and valued the ability to choose a companion as means to preserve personal integrity.

conclusionsBoth providers and labour companions play an essential role in enhancing women's experiences of pregnancy and childbirth in Burkina Faso. Additional research and programmatic efforts are needed to support women's equitable participation in patient-provider interactions and operationalise the notion of choice of a labour companion in a contextually appropriate manner.

Indexed as

FriendsParturitionAdultBurkina FasoCesarean SectionDecision MakingFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicPregnancyQualitative ResearchYoung AdultAfrica South of the SaharaOBSTETRICSPatient-Centered CarePregnancyQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID42097646
PMCPMC13157755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.