Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42097297›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2026

Kinship, gender, and the social networks of caregivers for older adults.

James P Murphy, Esther M Friedman, David P Kennedy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James P MurphyEconomics, Sociology, and Statistics, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5250-8357
Esther M FriedmanInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6813-6471
David P KennedyIndependent Researcher, Los Angeles, California, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7742-1792

Funding

Health, Wellbeing, and the Social Networks of Family Caregivers of People with Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG066194 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FRIEDMAN, ESTHER M. · 2019 to 2024
$3.3M
National Institute on Aging at the National Institutes of Health 5R01AG066194-03NIA NIH HHS R01 AG066194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesCaregiving for older adults falls disproportionately on women and family members, but little research addresses how gender and kinship intersect to shape caregiver social support. This study generates an empirical typology of caregiver social networks and examines the types' association with caregiver gender, relationship to the recipient, and their interaction. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWe collected personal network data from a nationally representative sample of 2,824 caregivers in December 2020 and January 2021. We used zero-inflated negative binomial regressions of network size and latent profile analysis to identify network types based on their size, density, family composition, and proportion sharing in caregiving responsibilities. We used multinomial logistic regressions to examine associations between network type and caregiver and care recipient characteristics.

resultsWe identified three network types: close-knit kin (CKK) based networks; larger networks sharing caregiving activities; and small networks in which few or no contacts assisted with caregiving. Women caring for a spouse/partner were more likely to have larger networks with broader care-sharing than either married men or other women; non-kin caregivers disproportionately had smaller networks lacking care-sharing. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The results highlight the vulnerability of unpaid non-kin caregivers and suggest that interventions should consider the intersection of gender and kinship. This is important because the proportion of kinless older adults is expected to grow significantly, which may increase older adults' reliance on non-kin informal caregivers. Future work should examine whether differences in network type lead towards different outcomes by gender and caregiver-recipient relationship.

Indexed as

CaregiversFamilySocial NetworkingSocial SupportAgedAged, 80 and overFamily SupportFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSex FactorsSocial GroupCaregivingFamilyLatent profile analysisSocial capital

Identifiers

PMID42097297
PMCPMC13283475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.