Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42097292›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026

StrainMake: reproducible hybrid metagenomics with MAG recovery and strain-level resolution.

Baptiste Hennecart, Eugeni Belda, Raynald de Lahondès, Jean-Daniel Zucker, Edi Prifti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Baptiste HennecartIRD, Sorbonne Université, UMMISCO, Paris, 75005, France.ORCID 0009-0000-5945-9359
Eugeni BeldaIRD, Sorbonne Université, UMMISCO, Paris, 75005, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4307-5072
Raynald de LahondèsGMT Science, Paris, 75013, France.ORCID 0009-0000-2862-9589
Jean-Daniel ZuckerIRD, Sorbonne Université, UMMISCO, Paris, 75005, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5597-7922
Edi PriftiIRD, Sorbonne Université, UMMISCO, Paris, 75005, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8861-1305

Funding

French ANRJEMINI ANR-24-PESA-0010Paris Île-de-France Region
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryMetagenomic workflows involve complex multi-step analyses, from quality control and assembly to binning, annotation, and strain-level profiling. Few existing metagenomic pipelines achieve the combination of flexibility, reproducibility, and hybrid assembly support within a unified workflow. We present StrainMake, a Snakemake-based workflow for de novo metagenomic analysis from short, long, or hybrid sequencing data. StrainMake integrates widely used tools across all major steps-quality control, assembly, binning, dereplication, taxonomic and functional annotation-while also providing non-redundant gene catalogues, community-scale metabolic models, and strain-level microdiversity metrics. The modular design enables the use of alternative tools, scalable execution on HPC systems, and full reproducibility through Snakemake and Conda.

resultsApplied to the CAMI II strain-madness dataset, StrainMake produced high-quality assemblies and metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), while enabling strain-resolved comparisons across samples. Hybrid assemblies improved contiguity, whereas short-read assemblies offered faster runtimes, illustrating the workflow's benchmarking capacity. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: StrainMake is open source and available at https://github.com/UMMISCO/strainmake, together with comprehensive documentation. Generated data are deposited in Zenodo (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.16950162).

Indexed as

MetagenomeMetagenomicsSoftwareReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID42097292
PMCPMC13188985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.