Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42097130›Full record

ArticleJAMA pediatrics2026

Cash Transfers in the Perinatal Period and Investigations of Infant Maltreatment.

Sumit Agarwal, H Luke Shaefer, Samiul Jubaed, William Schneider, Eric D Finegood, Mona Hanna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sumit AgarwalInstitute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
H Luke ShaeferPoverty Solutions, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Samiul JubaedPoverty Solutions, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
William SchneiderSchool of Social Work, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana.
Eric D FinegoodMichigan State University-Hurley Children's Hospital Pediatric Public Health Initiative, Charles Stewart Mott Department of Public Health, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Flint.
Mona HannaMichigan State University-Hurley Children's Hospital Pediatric Public Health Initiative, Charles Stewart Mott Department of Public Health, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Flint.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Infants are most vulnerable to child maltreatment, in part due to poverty during the perinatal period. In 2024, the prenatal and infant cash prescription program Rx Kids was launched in Flint, Michigan, achieving nearly 100% aggregate uptake and providing every expectant mother with unconditional cash transfers during pregnancy and infancy. Objective: To examine whether implementation of the Rx Kids prenatal and infant cash prescription program was associated with changes in child welfare system involvement. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used administrative data from Children's Protective Services in Michigan among infants born January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2024. Synthetic difference-in-differences-a robust method for aggregate-level data and a single treated city-was used to compare changes in outcomes in Flint before and after implementation of Rx Kids relative to the corresponding change in control cities without the program. Data analysis was conducted from March 19, 2025, to March 4, 2026. Exposure: Flint residence among infants born in 2024 after Rx Kids implementation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was investigated maltreatment allegations within the first 6 months of life. Secondary outcomes included type of allegation (neglect vs nonneglect) and substantiated allegations. Results: In the 3 years prior to the implementation of Rx Kids, the proportion of infants with an investigated allegation within the first 6 months of life was 21.7% (646 of 2971 infants) in Flint and 19.5% (3921 of 20 124 infants) among control cities. After implementation of Rx Kids in 2024, the investigated allegation rate decreased to 15.5% (165 of 1065 infants) in Flint, falling below the investigated allegation rate of 20.6% (1303 of 6317 infants) among the control cities. Rx Kids was associated with a statistically significant 7.0-percentage-point decrease (95% CI, -12.9 to -1.0; P = .02) in the investigated allegation rate, corresponding to a 32% decrease relative to the preintervention period. There was a decrease in the rate of neglect-related, nonneglect-related, and substantiated allegations; these were directionally consistent with the primary outcome but not statistically significant. Results were robust to alternative model specifications. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, the Rx Kids prenatal and infant cash prescription program was associated with a significant reduction in investigated allegations of maltreatment among infants. These findings provide important evidence about the role of economic stability in preventing child welfare system involvement.

Indexed as

Child AbuseChild Protective ServicesPerinatal CareCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMichiganPovertyPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42097130
PMCPMC13154033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.