Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42096693›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026

Resource Use Patterns in US Telehealth Services: Machine Learning and Clustering Analysis Across 4 Specialties.

Aysenur Betul Cengil, Burak Eksioglu, Sandra Duni Eksioglu, Corey Hayes, Cari Bogulski, Mir Ali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aysenur Betul Cengil *Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-9468-6392
Burak Eksioglu *Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2999-6783
Sandra Duni Eksioglu *Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6674-2133
Corey Hayes *Institute for Digital Health and Innovation, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7776-6157
Cari Bogulski *Institute for Digital Health and Innovation, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6002-5945
Mir Ali *Institute for Digital Health and Innovation, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3199-5261

Funding

HRSA HHS U3GRH40001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe expansion of telehealth services, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, has transformed health care delivery in the United States. Telehealth promises greater access and resource efficiency by reducing wait times and appointment lengths, especially in specialties like psychiatry, behavioral health, bariatrics, and sleep medicine. However, disparities exist in adoption based on demographics, geography, and socioeconomic status, raising concerns about equitable access and optimal resource use.

objectiveThis study aims to evaluate how telehealth impacts health care resource use across 4 specialties by examining 2 key metrics: patient-to-provider ratios and appointment durations. It seeks to understand how factors such as patient demographics, facility characteristics, and social determinants influence telehealth adoption and efficiency using a national dataset spanning from 2018 to 2023.

methodsWe analyzed a deidentified dataset from Epic Cosmos, covering outpatient visits across 48 US states (2018-2023). After data preprocessing and feature engineering, we applied 3 machine learning (ML) models (random forest, extreme gradient boosting, and deep neural networks) to predict resource use. Using the model performing the best, feature importance was assessed using Shapley Additive Explanations values. We then used k-means clustering to group facilities into clusters per specialty. Comparative analyses were conducted to evaluate differences in use among clusters, during and after the pandemic.

resultsTelehealth use peaked in 2020 and has remained above prepandemic levels since then. In 2018-2023, telehealth adoption reached 36.9% (4,543,021/12,311,710) in psychiatry, 23.9% (5,321,099/22,264,013) in behavioral health, 21.2% (924,333/4,360,061) in bariatrics, and 16.8% (851,803/5,070,256) in sleep medicine. Telehealth visits were consistently shorter than office visits (mean reduction 12.24 minutes; SD 3.33 minutes; P=.18), while patient-to-provider ratios varied significantly across specialties. Among ML models, extreme gradient boosting regression achieved the best performance (patient-to-provider ratios: R

conclusionsTelehealth has become a sustainable component of health care, enhancing access and efficiency across both rural and urban areas. However, its impact varies across specialties and regions, highlighting the need for targeted strategies such as staffing support for vulnerable populations, infrastructure investments in rural facilities, and reimbursement models that reflect telehealth's resource use. This study provides robust evidence from ML and clustering analyses, demonstrating how telehealth shapes resource use and offering actionable insights for equitable and sustainable integration.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMedicineTelemedicineCluster AnalysisClustering AlgorithmsCOVID-19Digital HealthHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2United StatesclusteringCOVID-19 pandemicdeep neural networksmachine learningresource usetelehealth

Identifiers

PMID42096693
PMCPMC13195373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.