Trial reportNeurology2026
IV Fosphenytoin for Acute Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesTrigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a debilitating condition characterized by sudden, severe facial pain. IV medications for acute TN exacerbations have not been investigated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Oral medications are often insufficient for acute attacks, and surgery is not immediately available. We conducted an RCT to evaluate IV fosphenytoin therapy (IFT) as a rapid-acting rescue treatment for acute TN exacerbations. We hypothesized that, compared with placebo, IFT would reduce acute TN pain.
methodsThis multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial was conducted at 6 institutions (April 2023-April 2024). Patients with classical or idiopathic TN who were experiencing TN exacerbation (numerical rating scale [NRS] score ≥5) were recruited from emergency and outpatient settings, and all study drugs were administered during hospital admission. Participants were randomized 1:1 to IFT (initial dose: 18 mg/kg, maintenance: 7.5 mg/kg for 4 days) or placebo. The primary end point was the change in NRS pain scores from baseline to 120 minutes after the initial dose. Secondary end points included attack frequency, the proportion achieving ≥50% NRS score improvement, and adverse events. Data were collected by blinded personnel and analyzed using repeated-measures mixed-effects models.
resultsOf 31 participants screened, 22 were randomized; 1 placebo-assigned participant did not meet the NRS ≥5 criterion and was excluded, leaving 21 for analysis (IFT: 11; placebo: 10). Participants had a mean age of 65.2 years (range 42-83; 8 men, 13 women). Compared with placebo, IFT significantly reduced pain (NRS change: -6.1 vs -2.4; between-group difference -3.8; 95% CI -6.4 to -1.1; DISCUSSION: IFT provided rapid and well-tolerated pain relief in acute TN exacerbations. Although findings are preliminary because of the small sample size, IFT may be a viable short-term treatment option, meriting further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCT2011220043. Registered March 3, 2023. First enrollment April 25, 2023. jrct.mhlw.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT2011220043. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that in patients with acute TN exacerbations, IV fosphenytoin is superior to placebo in reducing pain intensity at 120 minutes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.