ArticleHealth promotion international2026
International consensus on school health literacy responsiveness: findings from a modified Delphi process.
Article in Health promotion international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a lack of validated tools to assess health literacy responsiveness, defined as the organizational capacity of schools to create accessible and equitable environments that support health literacy development, in school settings internationally. This study, the second phase of a three-part research program, aimed to develop a school-based health literacy assessment tool through a systematic, multi-step development process. Building on a prior scoping review that identified 629 items from existing tools, 210 refined items were presented to 22 international experts via a modified Delphi survey. Experts rated relevance, domain fit, and need for revision. Consensus, derived from qualitative analysis of expert feedback, revealed 47 items as highly important, 119 as potentially relevant, and 44 as unsuitable for schools. Expert feedback informed conceptualization of organizational health literacy in schools. The items reflect practical considerations, cross-national, and multidisciplinary perspectives. Findings highlight strong support for domains such as communication, engagement, and workforce development. The next phase includes pilot testing and validation to support implementation of a tool to promote health literacy among students, teachers, and leaders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.