ArticleTree physiology2026
Diameter-driven variation in wood CO2 efflux across the stems and crowns of three temperate broadleaf tree species.
Article in Tree physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A major constraint on modelling woody-tissue CO₂ efflux is the scarcity of datasets that adequately represent its variability and underlying drivers. We intensively sampled CO₂ efflux along the vertical profile of nine temperate broadleaf trees across three species and found substantial longitudinal variation. We partitioned the flux into growth and maintenance-associated components; accordingly we use 'efflux' for measurements and 'respiration' only for the derived components. Expressing efflux by wood volume, surface area and sapwood volume each offered insight into the underpinning of the flux. However, efflux was most strongly associated with surface area, particularly in medium and large branches, and across both growth and maintenance respiration. In small branches, where sapwood dominates, this surface area scaling weakens, suggesting maintenance respiration shifts from surface area- to volume-based scaling, while growth respiration remains associated with surface area. Sapwood depth, tree ring width and the relative contributions of growth and maintenance respiration explained much of the variation in efflux, though additional biological and physical factors, such as CO₂ diffusion from sap and variation in sapwood parenchyma, likely also contribute. These findings represent an important step towards reducing uncertainty in the spatial scaling of woody-tissue CO₂ efflux by linking within tree variation in respiration to underlying anatomical and growth-related controls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.