Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42096534›Full record

ReviewJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association2026

Caring for Caregivers: System-Level Solutions to Moral Injury in Burn Teams.

Joshua Khorsandi, Jason Mirharooni, Joshua Ahdout, Justin Kahen, Eli Nazarian, Demitri Franzoni, Joshua MacDavid

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joshua KhorsandiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV 89106, United States.ORCID 0009-0006-6426-5915
Jason MirharooniDepartment of Surgery, Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, FL 33199, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-5719-5726
Joshua AhdoutDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV 89106, United States.
Justin KahenDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV 89106, United States.ORCID 0009-0008-1307-8321
Eli NazarianDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV 89106, United States.
Demitri FranzoniDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV 89106, United States.
Joshua MacDavidDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV 89106, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burn care teams-nurses, physicians, rehabilitation therapists, respiratory therapists, and unlicensed care providers such as burn technicians or patient care assistants-work amid catastrophic injury, disfigurement, severe pain, and complex end-of-life decisions, creating high risk for moral distress, moral injury, and compassion fatigue. This structured, PRISMA-informed narrative review synthesized burn-specific evidence and literature from analogous high-acuity settings. PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar were searched (English, 2010-2025; foundational earlier works retained). Eligible publications addressed ethically mediated workforce outcomes and organizational, systemic, or team-level drivers and responses; resilience-only studies were excluded unless conceptually informative. Burn-focused studies were sparse but aligned with ICU findings: antecedents included resource scarcity and staffing mismatch, perceived futility and contested goals of care, hierarchical role conflict and constrained voice, and ethically unsafe climates. Consequences clustered around emotional exhaustion, secondary traumatic stress, moral residue, turnover intention, and downstream risks to safety and quality. Across settings, the most promising protections were organizational: accessible leadership, safe staffing and predictable workload, psychologically safe communication, structured peer support and debriefings, reflective forums (eg, Schwartz Rounds), and proactive ethics consultation and moral distress consultation services that surface remediable policy and culture gaps. Moral suffering in burn units should be treated as an organizational ethics problem; embedding moral protection into governance, quality metrics, and ethics infrastructure is essential. Such system-level approaches can reduce preventable moral harm, sustain workforce retention, and protect patient and family experience in burn centers.

Indexed as

BurnsBurn UnitsCaregiversMoralsPatient Care TeamBurnout, ProfessionalCompassion FatigueEthical DilemmasHumansburn care teamsclinician well-beingcompassion fatiguemoral distressmoral injuryorganizational ethics

Identifiers

PMID42096534
PMCPMC13338633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.