ArticleGigaScience2026
Autoencoder/RandomForest-TabPFN for cross-cancer metabolomics: prostate and breast cancer diagnosis using paper spray and ion mobility-mass spectrometry techniques.
Article in GigaScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate and rapid disease diagnosis, particularly in prostate cancer (PC) and breast cancer (BC), is critical for early intervention and improved patient outcomes. Metabolomic signatures represent a robust molecular framework for elucidating cancer-associated biochemical reprogramming. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in biology in recent years has become widespread and promising. This study introduces a novel predictive method that integrates an Autoencoder, random forest-based feature selection and Tabular Prior-data Fitted Network (TabPFN) to achieve high diagnostic accuracy from metabolomics data of prostate and BC patients. The datasets were acquired using paper spray ionization mass spectrometry and flow injection-traveling-wave ion mobility-mass spectrometry of individuals diagnosed with PC and BC. When leveraging metabolomic profiling data from two distinct sources, PC urine and serum samples, the proposed model achieved an accuracy up to 98.75% in distinguishing diseased from healthy conditions. Additionally, we employed a BC dataset containing metabolic and lipidomic signatures acquired from core needle biopsies using a miniature MS platform coupled with PSI to assess the fidelity of our implementation across distinct cancer types. Our results on a well-characterized targeted dataset show that we can effectively reduce high-dimensional data into latent feature representations. At the same time, TabPFN captures tumor progression-related changes and feature interaction, thereby enhancing the possibility that the model will be a highly potent and effective tool for stage-specific diagnostic precision. Most existing machine learning approaches for disease diagnosis primarily rely on imaging, genomics, or clinical parameters, often overlooking the critical role of metabolites in identifying disease-specific biochemical signatures. By integrating metabolite-specific data with a robust deep-learning approach, this study demonstrates the transformative potential of AI in metabolomics-based diagnostics. The proposed model offers scalability and versatility, with applications extending beyond oncology to a much broader disease profiling aspect. These findings emphasize the value of combining multi-source metabolomic data with deep learning to advance personalized medicine and enhance diagnostic efficiency in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.