ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Living through Cyclone Freddy: "Gendered Health Impacts and Coping Responses in Malawi".
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malawi has increasingly faced severe climate-related disasters, with Cyclone Freddy in 2023 among the most devastating in the country's history. While disasters are often considered gender-neutral events, their impacts are shaped by gendered social roles and structural inequalities, resulting in differentiated experiences among women and men.This study examined the gendered health impacts and the responsiveness of humanitarian interventions during and after Cyclone Freddy in Malawi. We conducted a cross-sectional qualitative study in Blantyre (urban) and Chiradzulu (rural) districts between August and September 2024. Forty-six in-depth interviews were held with survivors, complemented by eight key informant interviews with representatives of governmental and non-governmental organizations involved in the response. Thematic analysis was applied to explore gender-specific experiences, health challenges, and perceptions of response efforts. Findings revealed significant gendered disparities. Women reported heightened loss of reproductive health services, and severe disruption to menstrual hygiene management and exposure to gender-based violence. Maternal health needs were largely unmet, and mental health services were delayed and under-resourced, exacerbating psychological distress among women and girls. Men primarily emphasized loss of livelihoods contributing to psychological distress linked to provider roles. While some humanitarian actors adopted gender-responsive measures, such as dignity kits and separate sanitation facilities, these efforts were inconsistent, often reactive, and limited by funding and planning gaps. Cyclone Freddy underscored the urgent need for gender-sensitive disaster preparedness and response frameworks in Malawi. Integrating gender considerations into health, protection, and recovery strategies is essential to mitigate inequitable impacts across all genders.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.