Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42096454›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Exploring the prevalence of reasons adolescents feel unwelcome at school.

Kristen M Lucibello, Lin Zheng, Scott T Leatherdale, Karen A Patte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kristen M LucibelloDepartment of Health Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6614-2007
Lin ZhengDepartment of Health Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.
Scott T LeatherdaleSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Karen A PatteDepartment of Health Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5214-1943

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cultivating positive school climates has been recognized as a global and Canadian priority for adolescent health, academic achievement, and development. Feeling welcome at school is an early contributor to overall positive school climate, although detailed understanding of different reasons adolescents may not feel welcome at school at the population-level is limited. The present study examined the prevalence of reasons students felt unwelcome at school and the characteristics of students endorsing each reason. Self-report survey data were used from students (N = 15,610, Mage ± SD = 15.6 ± 1.2, 48.1% girls) from 41 secondary schools in Ontario, Canada, that participated in the 2022-2023 wave of the COMPASS study. Frequencies calculated the prevalence of each reason for feeling unwelcome at school. Overall, 63.4% of students felt unwelcome at school for at least one reason. Appearance (29.6%), another reason (23.3%), marks at school (19.3%), emotional/psychological challenge (15.7%), and race/ethnicity/culture (10.6%) were the most common reasons for feeling unwelcome at school. Overweight perception, gender diverse identity, and low perceived relative financial affluence were overrepresented in participants that felt unwelcome at school relative to the overall sample. The many reasons adolescents feel unwelcome at school need to be addressed as schools focus on building positive and inclusive school climates, and should be considered across multiple levels (e.g., teacher training, students' learning materials, policy).

Indexed as

SchoolsStudentsAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleOntarioPrevalenceSelf ReportSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID42096454
PMCPMC13152152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.