ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Evaluation and estimation of epidemic trajectories for SARS-CoV-2 from clinical and wastewater data in Gauteng Province, South Africa.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inferring epidemic trajectories of viral infections from wastewater data can be a useful addition to clinical-based surveillance, as it provides low cost, population-level data that includes both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals who contribute to the sewer system. However, methods for analyzing wastewater data have been primarily applied to high-resource settings. It remains an open question to what extent epidemic dynamics can also be estimated from wastewater data in low-resource settings, where measurements are less frequent and the underlying catchment population is not clearly characterized. We used SARS-CoV-2 wastewater data from the Gauteng Province in South Africa (June 2021 to March 2022). We used the R packages EpiSewer and EpiNow2 to estimate the effective reproduction number (Rt) from wastewater data and geographically matched clinical surveillance data, respectively. The comparison between wastewater and clinical Rt showed that the observed trends are not perfectly aligned. Despite these differences, wastewater and clinical Rt estimates identified similar transmission patterns, which were similar to the trend seen directly from the recorded data. Maximum wastewater Rt of 1.38 (95% CI: 1.17-1.44) was observed in early November 2021, whilst clinical Rt was 1.18 (90% CI: 0.85-1.27) in June 2021. The change in Rt aligned with an increase or decrease in recorded cases. Our findings demonstrate that, even with limited data, estimating epidemic trajectories is feasible, providing valuable insights for informing public health recommendations. However, whenever possible, we recommend using wastewater surveillance as a complementary tool for clinical surveillance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.