Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42096439›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Towards reliable use of artificial intelligence to classify otitis media using otoscopic images: Addressing bias and improving data quality.

Yixi Xu, Al-Rahim Habib, Graeme Crossland, Hemi Patel, Chris Perry, Kris Bock, Tony Lian, William B Weeks, Rahul Dodhia, Juan Lavista Ferres and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yixi XuAI for Good Lab, Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0397-8832
Al-Rahim HabibSydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Graeme CrosslandDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Darwin Hospital, Tiwi, Northern Territory, Australia.
Hemi PatelDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Darwin Hospital, Tiwi, Northern Territory, Australia.
Chris PerryUniversity of Queensland Medical School, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Kris BockAzure FastTrack Engineering, Microsoft, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Tony LianSydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4936-0106
William B WeeksAI for Good Lab, Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, United States of America.
Rahul DodhiaAI for Good Lab, Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, United States of America.
Juan Lavista FerresAI for Good Lab, Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, United States of America.
Narinder Pal SinghSydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ear disease contributes significantly to global hearing loss, with recurrent otitis media being a primary preventable cause in children, impacting development. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers promise for early diagnosis via otoscopic image analysis, but dataset biases and inconsistencies limit model generalizability and reliability. This retrospective study systematically evaluated three public otoscopic image datasets (Chile; Ohio, USA; Türkiye) using quantitative and qualitative methods. Two counterfactual experiments were performed: (1) obscuring clinically relevant features to assess model reliance on non-clinical artifacts, and (2) evaluating the impact of hue, saturation, and value on diagnostic outcomes. Quantitative analysis revealed significant biases in the Chile and Ohio, USA datasets. Counterfactual Experiment I found high internal performance (AUC > 0.90) but poor external generalization, because of dataset-specific artifacts. The Türkiye dataset had fewer biases, with AUC decreasing from 0.86 to 0.65 as masking increased, suggesting higher reliance on clinically meaningful features. Counterfactual Experiment II identified common artifacts in the Chile and Ohio, USA datasets. A logistic regression model trained on clinically irrelevant features from the Chile dataset achieved high internal (AUC = 0.89) and external (Ohio, USA: AUC = 0.87) performance. Qualitative analysis identified redundancy in all the datasets and stylistic biases in the Ohio, USA dataset that correlated with clinical outcomes. In summary, dataset biases significantly compromise reliability and generalizability of AI-based otoscopic diagnostic models. Addressing these biases through standardized imaging protocols, diverse dataset inclusion, and improved labeling methods is crucial for developing robust AI solutions, improving high-quality healthcare access, and enhancing diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceOtitis MediaOtoscopyBiasChileData AccuracyHumansOhioReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID42096439
PMCPMC13152134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.