Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42096438›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Caffeine ingestion improves morning neuromuscular performance to evening levels in healthy females.

Akshay Singh, Stuart J Hesketh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Akshay SinghSchool of Medicine, University of Lancashire, Preston, United kingdom.
Stuart J HeskethSchool of Medicine, University of Lancashire, Preston, United kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7855-2380

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate whether caffeine ingestion offsets the circadian-related decline in morning neuromuscular performance in females.

methodsThirteen healthy females completed three experimental trials: i) evening placebo (PMPLAC), ii) morning placebo (AMPLAC), and iii) morning caffeine ingestion (6 mg·kg⁻¹; AMCAFF). A within-subject, repeated-measures, crossover, single-blind placebo design was used, with all subjects serving as their own controls. Each trial consisted of a maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of the knee extensors, followed by intermittent isometric contractions (6 s contraction, 4 s rest) until task failure, and a post-fatigue MVIC. Time to exhaustion, torque and peak force, surface electromyography (RMS amplitude, MDF frequency), rate of perceived exertion, and tympanic temperature were all recorded across conditions.

resultsDuring PMPLAC, peak force and time to exhaustion were significantly greater (p < 0.05) than for AMPLAC. Peak force was higher (p < 0.01) in AMCAFF in both pre- (+33%) and post- (+45%) fatigue MVIC trials compared to PMPLAC. Similarly, RMS was higher (p < 0.01) during both AMCAFF and PMPLAC compared to AMPLAC, whereas MDF did not change (p > 0.05) across trials. AMCAFF also improved (p < 0.01) time to exhaustion by 43% compared to AMPLAC, and significantly reduced (p < 0.01) rate of perceived exertion, but without any change (p > 0.05) in temperature.

conclusionsMorning ingestion of 6 mg·kg⁻¹ of caffeine effectively reverses diurnal reductions in neuromuscular performance of females by enhancing peak force and time to exhaustion to evening levels. No change in MDF, but an increased RMS suggests a central rather than peripheral mechanism for caffeine's ergogenic effects.

Indexed as

CaffeineCircadian RhythmMuscle, SkeletalAdultCross-Over StudiesElectromyographyFemaleHumansIsometric ContractionMuscle FatigueSingle-Blind MethodYoung AdultCaffeine

Identifiers

PMID42096438
PMCPMC13152181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.