Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42096430›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2026

Targeted sequencing enhances detection of pangolin trafficking hotspots and dynamics of both domestic and global trade markets.

Sean P Heighton, Jérôme Murienne, Mukesh Thakur, Alain Didier Missoup, Wirdateti Wirdateti, Chabi Sylvestre Djagoun, Sery Bi Gonedelé, Gabriel Ngua Ayecaba, Brice Roxan Momboua, Flobert Njiokou and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Sean P HeightonCentre de Recherche sur la Biodiversité et l'Environnement (CRBE), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, IRD, Toulouse INP, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7183-9140
Jérôme MurienneCentre de Recherche sur la Biodiversité et l'Environnement (CRBE), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, IRD, Toulouse INP, Toulouse, France.
Mukesh ThakurZoological Survey of India, New Alipore, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Alain Didier MissoupZoology Unit, Laboratory of Biology and Physiology of Animal Organisms, Faculty of Science, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon.
Wirdateti WirdatetiResearch Center for Biosystematics and Evolution, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), KST Soekarno, Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia.
Chabi Sylvestre DjagounLaboratoire d'Ecologie Appliquée, Faculté des Sciences Agronomiques, Université d'Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou, Benin.
Sery Bi GonedeléLaboratoire de Biotechnologie, Agriculture et Valorisation des Ressources Biologiques, UFR Biosciences, Université Félix Houphouët Boigny d'Abidjan-Cocody, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Gabriel Ngua AyecabaAmigos de la Naturaleza y del Desarrollo de Guinea Ecuatorial (ANDEGE), Barrio Ukomba, S/N, Bata, Equatorial Guinea.
Brice Roxan MombouaAgence Nationale des Parcs Nationaux, Libreville, Gabon.
Flobert NjiokouLaboratoire de Parasitologie et Ecologie, Faculté des Sciences, Universite de Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Anne-Lise ChaberSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Helen C NashDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Barbora Černá BolfíkováFaculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Sylvain DufourSYLVATROP Consulting, Conches sur gondoire, France.
Guy T GembuDépartement d'Ecologie et de Biodiversité des Ressources Terrestres, Centre de Surveillance de la Biodiversité, Faculté des Sciences de l'Université de Kisangani, Kisangani, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Ayodeji OlayemiNatural History Museum, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Jordi SalmonaCentre de Recherche sur la Biodiversité et l'Environnement (CRBE), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, IRD, Toulouse INP, Toulouse, France.
Amaia IribarCentre de Recherche sur la Biodiversité et l'Environnement (CRBE), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, IRD, Toulouse INP, Toulouse, France.
Yves CuenotCentre de Recherche sur la Biodiversité et l'Environnement (CRBE), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, IRD, Toulouse INP, Toulouse, France.
Philippe GaubertCentre de Recherche sur la Biodiversité et l'Environnement (CRBE), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, IRD, Toulouse INP, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1375-9935

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pangolins have become emblematic of the global wildlife trade crisis due to intense trafficking for consumption and traditional medicine. Coupled with habitat loss, the illicit trade in pangolins has severely threatened wild populations. Genetic identification of distinct pangolin populations is an imperative step toward guiding effective and informed conservation management. These populations can serve as a reference for assigning seized individuals to their geographic origins, and thus tracing trafficking networks. However, pangolin population genetics studies have been hindered by limited sampling of geo-referenced individuals, largely due to the species' elusive nature. To address this, we developed a tailored gene-capture approach targeting 671 loci totaling 627 kb with high evolutionary and adaptive value across all eight pangolin species. We optimized the approach for low-quality DNA, including samples from museum collections and wildlife trade, such as bushmeat and scale seizures. We reassessed range-wide population delineations for the three most traded species, the white-bellied (Phataginus tricuspis), Sunda (Manis javanica), and Chinese (M. pentadactyla) pangolins, highlighting the need for biogeographically consistent lineage nomenclature and spatially aware analyses to support coherent conservation planning. The unprecedented geo-referenced DNA database for the three species yielded snapshot insights into pangolin trafficking hotspots and trade dynamics of both domestic markets and global trade seizures, the former providing novel insights into bushmeat trade. Domestic trade reflects local and occasional cross-border sourcing, averaging 454 km across the three species, while international trafficking seizures in mostly scales point to broader, regional procurement. However, common sourcing regions between the two trade market types indicate their interconnectivity, suggesting that local trade may contribute to international trade supply. Our study identified significant international trade hotspots for the white-bellied, Sunda, and Chinese pangolins, centered around southwestern Cameroon, southwestern Borneo Island, and Myanmar, respectively. Addressing geo-referenced sampling gaps and increasing local-to-global seizure data over time may offer deeper spatiotemporal insights into pangolin trade dynamics. Our study design may serve as a replicable model for enabling authorities and practitioners to implement intelligence-driven, geographically targeted interventions, by identifying the key regions most implicated in pangolin trafficking.

Indexed as

CommercePangolinsAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesGenetics, PopulationSequence Analysis, DNAWildlife Trade

Identifiers

PMID42096430
PMCPMC13152146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.