ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2026
Distance-Restraint-Guided Diffusion Models for Sampling Protein Conformational Changes and Ligand Dissociation Pathways.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein conformational dynamics and ligand binding processes are fundamental to biological function, yet their systematic sampling and thermodynamic characterization remain challenging. Here, we present a distance-restraint-guided inference method that extends AlphaFold3-like diffusion model frameworks to predict protein structures at specified conformational states. By restraining intergroup distances─defined as geometric centroid distances between atom groups─during the reverse diffusion process, our method enables systematic sampling along reaction coordinates without model retraining. We implemented this approach in Boltz-2 and demonstrated its effectiveness on three model proteins that undergo open-closed conformational transitions, as well as on a protein-peptide dissociation pathway. Compared with conventional approaches that induce conformational diversity by manipulating the input multiple sequence alignments, our method achieved more uniform coverage of conformational space while maintaining high structural quality as assessed by both learning-based confidence metrics and stereochemistry-based validation. By combining distance-restrained sampling with molecular dynamics simulations, we constructed free energy landscapes and quantitatively estimated binding free energies. Altogether, our approach bridges deep learning-based structure prediction and physics-based simulations, providing an efficient strategy for characterizing the dynamics of biomolecules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.