Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42096224›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2026

"Time to See" in Infantile Nystagmus.

Katherine Ward, Lee McIlreavy, Matt J Dunn, Christopher M Harris, Fergal A Ennis, Jonathan T Erichsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katherine WardSchool of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Lee McIlreavySchool of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Matt J DunnSchool of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Christopher M HarrisRoyal Eye Infirmary, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Fergal A EnnisSchool of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Jonathan T ErichsenSchool of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Interventions that dampen the involuntary eye oscillation in infantile nystagmus (IN) often only elicit modest improvement in visual acuity (VA), even when subjective improvement is reported. Unique to nystagmus, the repeated movement of the fovea away from the intended visual target introduces a temporal dimension to vision. We hypothesized that the viewing time required to resolve optotype stimuli is increased in people with IN and that this measure of "time to see" increases with IN severity. Methods: Exposure duration thresholds (viewing times) were measured psychophysically for 18 individuals with IN and 14 controls for an optotype orientation discrimination task at spatial frequencies varying relative to each participant's VA. Viewing times were measured at two gaze positions (toward the IN null zone, where waveform intensity is lower, and away from the null zone, where intensity is higher) to establish the effect of IN severity as quantified by intensity. Results: Exposure duration thresholds were significantly longer in those with IN than controls (P = 0.027) and increased significantly with IN intensity (P = 0.034). Both effects were greatest for optotypes sized at participant-relative VA. Conclusions: "Time to See" is increased in IN and is sensitive to within-participant changes in IN severity, suggesting that exposure duration threshold could be a useful measure of visual function in people with IN.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsNystagmus, CongenitalVisual AcuityAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotic StimulationPsychophysicsSensory ThresholdsTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42096224
PMCPMC13170726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.