ArticleInsights into imaging2026
The MR quality landscape in Europe.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesOver the last few years, with the introduction of advanced MR imaging techniques, increasing exam demand and the growth of multi-center clinical trials and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven analysis, it has become increasingly difficult to guarantee image quality across time and institutions. Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality Control (QC) programs have therefore become essential. The aim of the survey was to map how MRI QA and QC are implemented in routine clinical practice and, where applicable, in research settings, across Europe, to identify the points where harmonization, coordination, or further education is needed. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn anonymous survey was distributed between October and December 2024 through ESR, EFOMP, EFRS member societies and ESMRMB to healthcare professionals, addressing five broad categories: characteristics of participants and their institutions, national MRI QA/QC guidelines/legislation and awareness, local organization for MRI QA, local (institute level) organization for MRI system performance QCs, conventional imaging QCs and qMRI QCs.
results269 responses were obtained from 37 different countries. Respondents were radiologists (52%), followed by Medical Physics Experts/Physicists/Engineers (30%), and radiographers (17%). Only a few countries have mandated national legislation addressing MRI QA/QC, while many others rely on voluntary guidelines or lack formal protocols. Most respondents recognized the importance of robust QA/QC programs. There is a strong consensus among respondents on the need for harmonized guidelines from organizations like ESR, multidisciplinary collaboration, and easily accessible training.
conclusionsThe European landscape regarding MRI quality is very heterogeneous, with different regulations across countries, and different penetration of MRI QA and QC training and regulation. The European Society of Radiology is optimally positioned with partners to play an active role in the harmonization of MRI quality education and practices across Europe, and we propose the development of a set of recommendations for MRI quality control and assurance. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: There is scope for raising awareness of both MRI Quality Control (QC) and Quality Assurance (QA) issues and improvement in these fields to ensure patient safety, reduce diagnostic errors, and allow more patients to benefit from MR imaging. KEY POINTS: Our survey of MRI QA and QC practices across Europe revealed significant heterogeneity in regulations and practices between countries and institutions. There is a widespread lack of awareness and implementation of MRI quality guidelines. The ESR MR Safety and Quality Committee advocates for the standardization and enhancement of MRI quality training for all professionals involved in this issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.