ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Prognosis After Curative Resection of Esophageal Basaloid Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough several studies have described the clinicopathologic features of esophageal basaloid squamous cell carcinoma (EBSCC), its prognosis after curative esophagectomy remains unclear in the modern treatment era.
methodsThis study retrospectively reviewed 803 patients who underwent subtotal esophagectomy at Kumamoto University Hospital between April 2005 and December 2023. Clinicopathologic features of EBSCC, including response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcomes, were compared with those of conventional esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
resultsAmong the 803 patients, 33 (4.1 %) had a diagnosis of EBSCC. Of these, 10 EBSCC and 248 ESCC patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. None of the EBSCC patients achieved a pathologic response greater than grade 2, whereas 27.8 % of the ESCC patients did (p = 0.01). Recurrence was experienced by for 11 of the 33 EBSCC patients and 218 of the 770 ESCC patients. Hematogenous recurrence was significantly more frequent in EBSCC (82 % vs. 27 %), whereas lymph node recurrence was less common (18 % vs 53 %). Overall survival (OS) was comparable between the groups, with 5-year OS rates of 68.2 % for EBSCC and 70.2 % for ESCC (p = 0.61, log-rank).
conclusionDespite its resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and a higher tendency for hematogenous metastasis, EBSCC exhibits a prognosis comparable with that of ESCC after curative esophagectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42096139What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.