Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42096130›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2026

Fractional-Order Spiking Bayesian Neural Model for Cognitive Computations.

Vikas Arya, Daya Krishan Lobiyal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vikas AryaSchool of Computer and Systems Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, 110067, India. vikas28_scs@jnu.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-3834-2529
Daya Krishan LobiyalSchool of Computer and Systems Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, 110067, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4743-3930

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognition under uncertainty can be formalized through Bayesian inference, but biologically plausible neural implementations remain a challenge. This study develops a Bayesian neural model for lifespan prediction that integrates fractional-order dynamics into classical Leaky Integrate-and-Fire and Izhikevich neuron models. The inclusion of fractional derivative introduces long-term memory, and thus enhancing both biological plausibility and representational capacity of the Bayesian neural model. Experimental results demonstrate that fractional-order neuron models consistently provide closer alignment with both human predictions and optimal Bayesian predictions. The large-scale fractional-order Izhikevich model shows the most robust convergence and cortical plausibility. These findings highlight the role of fractal neural dynamics in probabilistic cognition and bridging theoretical Bayesian models with realistic spiking behavior. The study demonstrates how biologically inspired spiking neuron models can approximate Bayesian inference, suggesting pathways for computational neuroscience to design models that learn, predict, and adapt with the efficiency of cortical computations. Further, in this study, neural populations represent priors from demographic lifetables. However, a uniform likelihood and posterior that yield median lifespan predictions as probability distributions within the Neural Engineering Framework have been retained from the previous study. To investigate the influence of neural population size on biological plausibility and Bayesian optimality, experimental conditions systematically increase the neural population size and compare the predictive outcomes.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsCognitionModels, NeurologicalNeuronsAnimalsBayes TheoremComputer SimulationHumansBayesian frameworkFractal calculusNeural engineering objectsNeuronal dynamicsProbabilistic computations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.