ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
A Bayesian approach to temporal surgical segmentation model fusion.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRobotic-assisted surgery (RAS) generates vast amounts of video and robotic data, presenting opportunities for machine learning. Video-based models, in particular, that can temporally segment frames by ontological categories such as procedure type, phase, steps, actions, etc., are needed. Training separate models for each category neglects statistical dependencies between categories and can yield incompatible predictions. Training large multi-category models may help, but increases complexity while reducing model modularity and interpretability.
methodsWe present a model fusion alternative: an effectively zero-free-parameter Bayesian model fusion technique. Incorporating the empirical conditional dependencies across categories and time, we combine predictions from multiple segmentation models into one joint Bayesian inference. The result is a Bayes' optimal distribution over all categories evolving over time with accumulated evidence.
resultsOn a large test set of hundreds of surgical cases, of nearly eight million frames of annotated data, we found that fused predictions from the joint Bayesian model provide clear benefits over the individual models, correcting inconsistent and inaccurate predictions, and even forming accurate beliefs when evidence was absent.
conclusionThe model we present is a lightweight, principled alternative to machine learning-based model fusion. A sufficiently complex model could be trained to produce the same results, but would effectively trade explainable predictions with minimal overheard for computational complexity and transparency. We end by discussing how the same approach can be used to encompass larger more sophisticated models within the same conceptual framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42096125What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.