ArticleTranslational stroke research2026
Proteomic Analysis of Differentially Expressed Proteins in Ischemic Stroke Recovery and Their Implications for Therapeutic Outcomes.
Article in Translational stroke research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ischemic stroke is a condition characterized by the obstruction of blood flow to the brain, typically caused by a blood clot, leading to brain tissue damage and impaired neurological function. This study aims to use proteomic analysis to reveal the protein expression differences between different recovery results (meaningful recanalization [MFR] and futile recanalization [FTR]) in the recovery process of patients with ischemic stroke after thrombosis. We collected plasma samples from the healthy control (CON), MFR, and FTR groups, and used high-throughput data-independent collection (DIA) mass spectrometry for proteomic analysis. A total of 5,040 proteins were identified in the study, of which 775 were differentially expressed proteins (DEPs). The functional enrichment analysis revealed that these proteins are involved in lipid metabolism, amino acid synthesis, cell signaling regulation, and other pathways, especially between the FTR and MFR groups; the expression differences of specific proteins reflect biological differences in the recovery process. We identified 11 key DEPs, including Phospholipid Transfer Protein, Fructose-Bisphosphate Aldolase A, Alpha-Enolase 1, and Fatty Acid-Binding Protein, which may be potential biomarkers for predicting stroke recovery. This study provides new insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying recovery after ischemic stroke, particularly the molecular differences associated with distinct recovery outcomes, and identifies potential markers for personalized treatment and prognostic evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42096101What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.