ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2026
[Doping in recreational sports].
Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Doping is commonly perceived as being primarily associated with professional sports rather than recreational sports. This article is a discussion paper and addresses doping in recreational sports from conceptual, methodological, and empirical perspectives. Established doping definitions, particularly those of the World Anti-Doping Agency, are only partially transferable to recreational sports contexts due to their strong focus on organizational affiliation and competitive settings. For large segments of recreational sport, the concept of performance-enhancing substance use therefore provides a more appropriate description.Assessing the prevalence of such use is methodologically challenging due to the sensitive nature of the topic and the lack of control mechanisms. Indirect survey techniques reduce socially desirable responding and yield more realistic estimates. The unrelated question model (UQM) is a randomized response technique that ensures full anonymity and enables robust prevalence estimates of sensitive behaviors at the population level.Empirical findings using the UQM among recreational athletes in endurance, fitness, and bodybuilding contexts indicate that the use of performance-enhancing substances is not a marginal phenomenon. Prevalence estimates suggest a relevant and stable level over time. Strong associations are observed with non-therapeutic use of pain medication and an increasing medicalization of performance optimization. Evidence of access via healthcare structures highlights the structural embedding of this phenomenon. Overall, the use of performance-enhancing substances in recreational sport represents a socially and medically relevant field of action that requires differentiated prevention strategies and greater integration into medical education and training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.