Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42096072›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2026

The practice effect of smartphone-derived cognitive processing speed assessments as a proxy of cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis.

Daan J de Jong, Pam C G Molenaar, Vera Verhoef, Lenka Novakova, Elisa Colato, Tommy A A Broeders, Samantha Noteboom, Ka-Hoo Lam, Sonja Cloosterman, Bastiaan Moraal and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Training effects in oculography in multiple sclerosis patients: a one-year longitudinal study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Daan J de JongMS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. d.j.dejong@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1616-191X
Pam C G MolenaarAmsterdam Neuroscience, Neuroinfection & Neuroinflammation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vera VerhoefAmsterdam Neuroscience, Neuroinfection & Neuroinflammation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lenka NovakovaDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Elisa ColatoMS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tommy A A BroedersMS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Samantha NoteboomMS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ka-Hoo LamAmsterdam Neuroscience, Neuroinfection & Neuroinflammation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sonja CloostermanMS Sherpa B.V., Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Bastiaan MoraalMS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dennis NieuwkampDepartment of Neurology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Oliver GerlachDepartment of Neurology, Academic MS Centrum Zuyd, Zuyderland MC, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
Jop MostertDepartment of Neurology, Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Eva M M StrijbisAmsterdam Neuroscience, Neuroinfection & Neuroinflammation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Menno M SchoonheimMS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joep KillesteinAmsterdam Neuroscience, Neuroinfection & Neuroinflammation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tom A N FuchsMS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn multiple sclerosis (MS), symbol digit modalities test (SDMT) scores are often influenced by practice effects. We evaluated the SDMT practice effect as a proxy of cognitive performance by relating it to disease severity and future performance.

methodsPeople with MS (pwMS) and healthy controls (HCs) were evaluated at baseline and five-year follow-up. Practice effects were modeled using two-part piecewise linear regression on daily smartphone SDMT (sSDMT) scores. Cognitive impairment (CI) and preservation (CP) were defined relative to HC baseline sSDMT z-scores (CI: z < -1.67, CP: z ≥ -1.67). Practice outcomes across HC/CP/CI were compared using ANCOVA and correlated to baseline variables. They were also assessed in relation to clinical outcomes and brain volumes in cross-sectional and baseline-follow-up models.

results85 pwMS (CP/CI: 66/19) and 20 HCs were analyzed. 73 pwMS completed follow-up (5.39 ± 0.38y). A practice plateau occurred in 80%/82%/100% of HC/CI/CP. Higher baseline sSDMT was related to higher plateau sSDMT (ρ = 0.930, p < 0.001) and lower %-increase (ρ = -0.266, p = 0.013). %-increase was higher in CI than CP (CI/CP = 22.0%/15.5 adj.p = 0.004), but the absolute ∆-increase and breakpoint were similar across groups. Associations of disability, cognition, and brain volumes with the plateau sSDMT were stronger when compared to the baseline sSDMT. No other associations were found cross-sectionally and in the baseline-follow-up models.

conclusionsEarly-phase sSDMT practice effects were related to cognitive performance but were unique to disease status or associated with disease severity in pwMS. Plateau sSDMT showed stronger associations with disability and brain volumes than baseline performance. Interpretation of SDMT performance should therefore consider practice effects.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionMultiple SclerosisNeuropsychological TestsPractice, PsychologicalProcessing SpeedSmartphoneAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedCognitionMobile devicesMultiple sclerosisPractice effects

Identifiers

PMID42096072
PMCPMC13152975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.