Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42096067›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2026

Prognosis of neonates receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in low-resource settings: a systematic review and prognostic meta-analysis.

Vijay Kumar Krishnegowda, Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry Ramaswamy, Prathik Bandiya, Tapas Bandyopadhyay, Thangaraj Abiramalatha, Abdul Kareem Pullattayil, Daniele Trevisanuto

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vijay Kumar KrishnegowdaDepartment of Neonatology, Institute of Medical Sciences and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry RamaswamyDepartment of Neonatology, Fernandez Foundation, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Prathik BandiyaDepartment of Neonatology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Tapas BandyopadhyayVardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Thangaraj AbiramalathaDepartment of Neonatology, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital (KMCH), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Abdul Kareem PullattayilHealth Sciences Librarian Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Daniele TrevisanutoDepartment of Woman's and Child's Health, University of Padova, Padua, Italy. daniele.trevisanuto@unipd.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Provision of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in the neonatal intensive care has seen a steady rise in low-esource settings (LRS). However, outcomes among those exposed to IMV remain under-reported, with the current evidence base being restricted to single-centre observational studies, thus limiting comparative analyses and effective healthcare planning. This study aims to estimate the pooled proportion of mortality and morbidity among neonates exposed to IMV in low-resource settings. Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched until 22 August 2025. Randomised and non-randomised studies were included. Two reviewers, blinded to each other, extracted data independently. Proportion-based meta-analyses using random-effects model were performed. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-E, and evidence-certainty was evaluated using the GRADE approach. One hundred of 117 studies were included, with most conducted in South Asia. In-hospital mortality was reported in 68 studies (7193 neonates), with a pooled estimate of 45% (39%-50%), evidence-certainty being very low. Among the secondary outcomes, the pooled rates were as follows: bronchopulmonary dysplasia, 10% (5%-18%); intraventricular haemorrhage (any grade), 10% (5%-19%); necrotising enterocolitis (any stage), 14% (6%-31%); retinopathy of prematurity (any stage), 33% (22%-46%); ventilator-associated pneumonia, 21% (14%-29%); sepsis, 32% (25%-40%) and pulmonary haemorrhage, 9% (6%-14%). Evidence-certainty for all the secondary outcomes was also very low. Subgroup analysis comparing two distinct time epochs revealed a significant difference in mortality, 43% (36%-50%) (I

Indexed as

Respiration, ArtificialHospital MortalityHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalPrognosisResource-Limited SettingsLow- and middle-income countriesMechanical ventilationMortalityNeonatesPretermRespiratory distress

Identifiers

PMID42096067
PMCPMC13152968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.