ArticleInternational journal of biometeorology2026
Hybrid machine learning approaches outperform mechanistic models of bloom timing in Eastern Redbud, Cercis canadensis.
Article in International journal of biometeorology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting the timing of flowering has utility both in climate change planning and practical applications. Eastern Redbud (Cercis canadensis), a charismatic spring-flowering tree found predominantly in the eastern USA, has long captured public attention, yet robust models of its bloom timing are lacking. Here, we aim to understand flowering onset dynamics of C. canadensis, a challenge given potential for local adaptation and plasticity across its range. We utilized a hybrid phenology modeling framework that integrates a mechanistic chill–heat framework with a machine-learning correction layer. We expected that this integrative model would better capture non-linear dynamics in flowering onset across its range. Using observations of bloom onset maintained by the USA National Phenology Network collected across the tree’s range, we parameterized a process-based model incorporating chilling, forcing, and photoperiod cues, adjusted for latitude. This model predicted bloom dates with a mean absolute error of 7.3 days. Incorporating a machine-learning correction layer yielded a cross-validated mean error of 6.1 days, with improved representation of local anomalies and interannual variability. Out-of-sample validation using observations from herbarium and iNaturalist indicated the hybrid model retained predictive skill across contemporary and historical contexts. Our results also revealed that trees at higher latitudes require greater chilling and less forcing to flower than southern individuals. These results highlight the value of hybrid approaches that combine known extrinsic drivers linked to physiology with more flexible machine learning approaches, providing improved species-wide generalization. These analyses showcase both integrative modeling and integrative validation approaches to advance phenological forecasting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.