Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42096013›Full record

ArticlePrimates; journal of primatology2026

Filling, color, and shape: individuality in chimpanzee drawings.

Cédric Sueur, Agathe Nicolas, Marie Pelé, Satoshi Hirata

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Primates; journal of primatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cédric SueurUniversité de Strasbourg, IPHC UMR7178, CNRS, Strasbourg, France. cedric.sueur@iphc.cnrs.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8206-2739
Agathe NicolasUniversité de Strasbourg, IPHC UMR7178, CNRS, Strasbourg, France.
Marie PeléETHICS EA 7446, ANTHROPO-LAB, Université Catholique de Lille, F- 59000, Lille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2297-5522
Satoshi HirataWildlife Research Centre, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1026-6270

Funding

Institut écologie et environnement Comp²AJapan Society for the Promotion of Science London 23H00494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the origins of drawing in humans requires studying the drawing behavior of our closest relatives, the great apes. This study examines the drawing behavior of chimpanzees to assess cognitive abilities in a long-term context. Our systematic analysis of previously unseen and newly documented drawings from six chimpanzees over several years revealed significant inter- and intra-individual differences, as well as seasonal variation. Chimpanzees used multiple colors, but no specific color preferences were observed. Although they use their right hand more, they can use both hands to produce a single drawing. Using Principal Component Analysis (PCA), we identified three graphically significant dimensions: filling aspect, color aspect and shape aspect, suggesting that the measures were meaningfully or intentionally regrouped. Drawing style varied between seasons, but more importantly between individuals, with each chimpanzee exhibiting a kind of unique drawing personality. In addition, changes in drawing style were observed over the years, suggesting a development in individual drawing behavior. Comparisons with previous studies on orangutans and human children suggest that chimpanzee drawing may reflect personality traits and common cognitive abilities. These findings add to our understanding of the evolutionary origins of human artistic expression.

Indexed as

Pan troglodytesTool Use BehaviorAnimalsCognitionColorFemaleIndividualityMaleSeasonsArt evolutionBiological anthropologyDrawing cognitionLaterality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.